In the Trenches: The Cost of a Delayed Investigation

I’ve covered the importance of timely investigations before, but I cannot overemphasize its impact. A delayed investigation can significantly affect credibility, morale, and trust in the process. That said, this doesn’t mean rushing forward without a plan. In this week’s Investigative Edge, I’m sharing a case that demonstrates the cost of delay and lessons learned.

The Investigation

In this Trenches case, I was brought in months after the initial incident. The investigation itself took several months, and by the time it concluded, it had been nearly a year since the incident occurred. Memories had faded, narratives had aligned, and further harm was done to the organization. The delay between the initial incident and the start of the investigation created multiple challenges.

By the time I was brought in, many of the witnesses were unclear on the specifics of what had happened. This lack of clarity was a major hurdle from the start because accurate timelines and details are the foundation of any investigation. The long gap also meant that employees had plenty of time to talk to each other about the incident, which resulted in their stories aligning, whether intentionally or not.

As the investigation went on, it became obvious that the delay hadn’t just affected witness recollection but also caused issues within the organization. Employees felt like leadership had ignored them, leading to a drop in morale. The longer the incident went unresolved, the more frustrated people became. Distrust in both the investigation process and leadership itself came through during interviews. Employees were upset that the situation had been left unaddressed for so long, which made them question the credibility of their leaders and the investigation.

On top of that, the delay caused tensions in the workplace, which affected teams that had previously worked well together. Employees who had been directly involved in or impacted by the incident were stuck in an environment filled with uncertainty and gossip, which made things even worse.

The Challenges

1. Faded Memories: With such a long gap between the incident and the investigation, many witnesses found it hard to recall specific details. People’s recollection of events changes naturally over time, and this fading of memory can introduce inconsistencies, even in well-intentioned witnesses. This made it difficult to piece together an accurate timeline of events.

2. Aligned Narratives: People had time to talk, compare notes, and potentially coordinate their stories. While aligned stories are not inherently problematic, in this case, the shared narratives appeared rehearsed, making it difficult to assess each person’s independent recollection of events. When people had had months to exchange thoughts and ideas, distinguishing between genuine memory and collective storytelling became more challenging.

3. Damaged Trust: The lengthy delay resulted in employees feeling that their concerns weren’t a priority. By the time I started the investigation, morale was already low, and there was little faith in the outcome. When trust in the investigation process is low, it becomes much harder to elicit candid, cooperative participation from witnesses.

4. Further Harm: The delay exacerbated harm within the organization. As the workplace tensions remained unresolved, employee engagement declined, and distrust began to affect productivity and interpersonal relationships. By the time of the investigation, it was clear that the delay had left long-term damage—damage that could have been mitigated with a more timely response.

Lessons Learned: Timeliness Is Key

Here are some lessons that may help you avoid the pitfalls of delayed investigations:

1. Act Quickly, but Thoroughly
   Investigations are time-sensitive, and delays can make things worse. That said, moving fast doesn’t mean skipping over important steps. Starting the process early can help prevent more harm and shows that the issue is being taken seriously. The key is to start gathering information to assess the situation up front so you can be thorough without feeling like you’re rushing.

2. Assess Credibility When Memories Fade
   When an investigation is delayed, you have to be careful with credibility. People’s memories fade over time, but their confidence in what they remember may not fade as quickly. That’s why it’s important to check statements against documents, timelines, or other independent evidence to piece together what happened.

3. Reinforce Accountability
   One of the risks of a delayed investigation is that it can feel like no one’s being held accountable. If the organization doesn’t act quickly, it can send the message that misconduct isn’t a big deal. Even if you’re starting late, it’s important to make sure everyone knows that addressing concerns is a priority and that accountability still matters.

4. Rebuild Trust Post-Investigation
   Trust is fragile, especially during an investigation. When things take longer than expected, you need a plan to rebuild trust in the organization. This means being clear about the outcome (without breaking confidentiality), taking action on the issues that were uncovered, and following through to show that the findings are being taken seriously.

5. Remember the Human Side
   Delays don’t just affect the investigation—they affect people. By the time I got to the interviews, many employees had been dealing with the fallout of the incident for months. Their frustrations and doubts were just as important to address as the facts of the case. While our primary role is to figure out what happened, we also need to be aware of how the process impacts the people involved and, when possible, help the organization take steps to move forward.

Conclusion

This case taught me that the timeliness of an investigation is just as important as its thoroughness. Delays can do lasting harm, both to the credibility of the investigation and to the morale of the organization. By prioritizing prompt action, maintaining focus on accountability, and addressing the root causes, we can mitigate these risks and ensure a more positive outcome for all involved.

If you liked this article, do me a favor, share it with a colleague or repost it to your network.

Together we’re building a community of investigators committed to elevating workplace culture.